12/27/2023 0 Comments Opening chess moves reddit![]() ![]() Instructions for /r/chess PGN addon ( Chrome, Firefox) ![]() So, yeah, not the easiest to interpret, but there are some interesting infos in that diagram.News Puzzles Games Strategy Twitch Other Resources ![]() A way to rephrase this is to say that if all you know is that a player is mainly a e4 player you have a better chance predicting what his black openings are than if they were a d4 player. If I understand correctly it means that the correlation between d4 as white isn't as correlated to specific black responses as e4 is. It seems people that play the French against e4 are rather likely to also play these d4 answers, but the correlation isn't nearly as strong as one might imagine and they're more likely to answer d4 with d5 apparently.Īnother surprising thing is the spot of the d4 cluster which is quite far from all black clusters while the e4 cluster is nicely centered and very close to clusters like the Sicilian. According to the paper, one half is the French, the other is mostly d4 answers that put the pawn on e6 (Nimzo, Catalan…). Now on to surprising things: the e6 split cluster. I think that much supports intuition, and many more correlations are shown in this diagram that, similarly, seem to support intuition. So people that play the Dutch seem to like playing the English more than people that play the Sicilian. It seems to look at the overall structure of the opening and not individual moves.Ĭloser clusters are related to each other. Move order is a consideration since black's answer can change what moves are available, but assuming passive play from the opponent playing e3 then d3 should result in the same thing as playing d3 then e3. So for example the "King's pawn" cluster makes sense on its own: if you play a king's pawn opening, you're likely to deviate and play different lines of the Ruy Lopez for example, but they'll be correlated together since you start the same every time.īut what's interesting is that this clustering isn't related to move order. On the diagram, closer points represent stronger correlation. I think "They're played together because they're similar" should be substantiated more, but even without caring about that it's interesting to see the objective correlations between openings and the types of openings that emerge from this view, freed from old classification. Please continue to give us your feedback and suggestions on how we can help make /r/chess better for everyone.įirst of all I read the paper mostly as "Hey, we wondered what openings were often part of the same player's repertoire and from there we made hypotheses to explain why it's the case and deduced things based on these hypotheses". Use the message the moderators link if your posts or comments don't appear, or for help with any administrative matters. Twitter/Facebook posts must contain a direct link to the tweet/post, and include the author's nameĬhess Spoiler format for problem answers etc., Public Moderator Logs (broken by API changes)ĭon’t engage in abusive, discriminatory, or bigoted behavior.ĭon't ask for advice about ongoing games.ĭo not use /r/chess exclusively to promote your own content. ![]() News Puzzles Games Strategy Twitch Other Resources ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |